1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (9099-C continued)
LPA Gil interviewed the licensee, who stated that the children in her care are well behaved. The licensee disclosed that one enrolled child (C1) has exhibited behaviors such as hitting and biting other children. The licensee stated that she actively redirects C1, teaches appropriate ways to express emotions, and works with C1's parents to address the behavior.
The licensee further stated that there was one incident involving C1 and another enrolled child (C3). According to the licensee, C1 was repeatedly hitting and bothering C3, who then struck C1 back with a toy, leaving C1 with a bruised eye. The licensee stated that this behavior was uncharacteristic of C3 and noted that C3 is on the autism spectrum. The licensee reported that she immediately redirected both children, provided appropriate supervision, and notified parents following the incident.
LPA Gil interviewed C1; however, C1 was nonverbal and was unable to provide a statement regarding the allegation or the reported incident.
When interviewed by LPA Gil, C3 did not recall the incident and stated that C3 was happy attending the daycare and enjoyed being in the licensee's care. The licensee stated that whenever a child hits or attempts to hit another child, she immediately intervenes, redirects the child, notifies the parents, and provides first aid as needed.
Interviews conducted with five enrolled children and five parents did not provide any corroborating statements or evidence to support the allegation. All interviewed parents stated they are satisfied with the care provided by the licensee and reported that they are notified, either at pick-up or by telephone, whenever an incident involving their child occurs. All parents interviewed disclosed there enrolled child has not returned from day care with any concerning bruises, scratches, or bite marks.
Based on LPA Gil's review of interviews conducted with the licensee, the assistant, five enrolled children, and five parents during the investigation, the allegation may have occurred or may be valid, however, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is determined to be unsubstantiated.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to the site supervisor, Ana Matal Banos.
|