1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by staff member (S2) and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the home and observed seven (7) children in care with one (1) adult staff member providing care and supervision in the enclosed patio of the home. At approximately 10:00am Licensee Monisha Satterfield arrived at the home. LPA obtained the following documents: children's roster, children’s files, and personnel files. Per Licensee all children and staff files were damage during a flood that took place in the home sometime in June 2025. LPA initiated interviews with relevant parties.
Based on the investigation conducted, interviews of all relevant parties and record review, there is not enough information to prove or disprove that Provider did not prevent inappropriate communication between minor and children, that the Provider yells at children in care, that the Provider did not prevent child from being hit by minor and that an uncleared adult resides in the home. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur; therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted, and report was reviewed with staff member (S4). A copy of this report and
appeal rights were discussed and left with S4. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.
Page 2 |