1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Co-Licensee stated children are not required to participate in an activity. Staff will let the children sit on the couch or read a book. Staff stated the children are offered an alternative option if they do not want to participate in an activity. The children will be redirected to another activity when they are not listening. The facility does not have a discipline policy. Parents stated the children are offered alternative food if the child does not want to eat what is being offered to them. Staff will also communicate with the parents to let them know if their child did not want to eat and/or participate in an activity. Parents stated the children are offered an alternative option if the child does not want to participate in the activity that the group is doing.
A full investigation was conducted which included observations and interviews. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the above alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation of Personal Rights is found to be unsubstantiated. Staff provide an alternative option if a child does not want to participate in an activity while at the daycare. There was insufficient evidence to determine that a Personal Rights violation occurred.
Exit interview was conducted with Shannon Bettes, Licensee. Appeal rights was provided to Licensee.
|