1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation 1: the first allegation stated that staff handled children in a rough manner. During the investigation, it was revealed that although staff did mention putting their hands on the children, they do not say it was in a rough manner. There has been no mention by the children, or other relevant parties, of being handled in a rough manner by any of the staff. After reviewing the relevant information obtained, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to support the allegation.
Allegation 4: the fourth allegation stated that staff interfered in toileting needs. During the investigation, it was revealed that children are taken to the restroom in groups of four and although there may be some delay if a group has just gone, then other staff comes to take other children to the restroom when they require it. There has been no mention by the children, or other relevant complaint parties, of being interfered with in their toileting needs. After reviewing the relevant information obtained, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to support the allegation.
Allegation 5: the fifth allegation stated that staff did not prevent children from hitting other children in care. During the investigation, it was revealed that although there was some hitting between the children, that the hitting was addressed by staff and did not exceed normal interactions of children of that age group. Also, there is a process in place that is being followed by the staff to ensure children are not being allowed to hit one another. The children, and other relevant complaint parties, have supported that the process explained by the staff is actually being followed at the facility. After reviewing the relevant information obtained, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to support the allegation.
After observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that there was insufficient evidence that the facility was not ensuring staff are in good health to provide care to children and that staff spoke inappropriately to children in care. The allegations could not be corroborated with the evidence found during the investigation. Therefore, the allegations have been found unsubstantiated. Although, the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the facility operated in violation of policy in this circumstance.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Director along with the Notice of Site Visit and Appeal Rights.
|