1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the interview with the Director, the Director denied having knowledge of the alleged incident involving Child 1 until it was brought to the attention of the Director by Child 1's parent. According to the Director, there were no witnesses to the alleged incident where Child 1 sustained a scratch on the upper chest area, below the neck. The scratch was observed on Child 1 by the parent after Child 1 had been picked up from the center and taken home. The Director is unsure where the alleged incident could have happened as there were no concerns brought to the attention of staff by Child 1, prior to leaving home for the day. Regarding the allegation of Staff are not allowing day care child's parents to enter and inspect the facility, the Director denied the allegation and stated that all parents are welcome to check on their children as it is the right of the parent(s). The Director stated that she has never denied Child 1's parent to enter and inspect the facility. During today's visit, LPA discussed Health and Safety Code 1596.857, regarding Rights of parent or guardian to inspect facility without advance notice; informing parents and guardians; prohibition of retaliation; violations; penalty; family child care home notification of parent rights. An Advisory Note was issued.
During the interview with staff, staff made no disclosures about observing the alleged incident involving Child 1. Staff were unsure where Child 1 could have sustained the scratch. Staff stated that Child 1 did not present concerns of discomfort and looked fine prior to leaving home for the day on 4/2/24. Staff also denied ever refusing to allow Child 1's parent or any other parent enter and inspect the facility. Staff interviewed were aware that it is the right of the parent to enter and inspect the child care center without advance notice whenever children are in care.
LPA was unable to interview Child 1 due to no availability. LPA made an attempt to interview Child 2 but was unsuccessful as Child 2 refused to speak to the LPA.
Parents interviewed did not present concerns related to the above-mentioned allegations and were pleased with the services and care being provided to their children.
Based on the investigation conducted, there is insufficient evidence to support the above-mentioned allegations to be true. Therefore, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
The Notice of Site Visit was provided and must remain posted for 30 days during the hours of operation after each site visit by a licensing representative. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a civil penalty of $100.00. Exit interview was conducted and Appeals Rights provided. |