1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | but no logs are entered. LPA attempted to interview R1, but R1 was unable to reply to the LPA's questions. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to prove that Staff does not provide proper care for R1's pressure injury and Staff does not reposition resident in care. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Staff leaves resident soiled for extended periods of time/Staff does not provide resident with clean linen:
In regards to the allegation, it was reported that R1 is constantly soiled with bowel movement, and their incontinence care is not properly performed. It was also reported that R1's bed has been found constantly with droppings of food and unclean linen. Interviews with two (2) of two staff reveal that R1 is checked on every two hours for their incontinent needs to insure they are not soiled. If there is an incontinent need, or soiled linen, staff would change the linen right away. During the investigation, LPA conducted a plant inspection of R1's room and check and observed that R1 was not soiled during the visit. Furthermore, LPA observed staff cleaning R1's room, and R1's linen had been changed. Staff stated they also had just changed R1 clothing in the morning. LPA attempted to interview R1, but R1 was unable to reply to the LPA's questions. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation that staff leaving R1 soiled for an extended period of time. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Staff does not properly shower resident:
In regards to the allegation, it was reported that R1's skin shows evidence of not being properly showered. Interview with two (2) of two staff reveal that R1 is not as mobile, therefore, R1 is given a bed bath everyday. Staff did indicate that a shower is provided as needed. LPA did a check of R1, and did not see any evidence of R1 having residue, droppings, secretions, of having a foul odor during the investigation. LPA attempted to interview R1, but R1 was unable to reply to the LPA's questions. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation of R1 not properly getting a shower. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. |