1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Record review revealed that R1 pressed on their pendant on different occasions, and there were times that facility staff responded well above 5 minutes of wait time.
In the month of January 2021, there were thirteen (13) different dates R1 pressed on their pendant multiple times, and staff’s response time ranged from 5 minutes up to 26 minutes. Two (2) out of thirteen (13) of these dates’ a response was required, but R1 was never responded to.
On 1/19/2021 at 10:11:22 a.m., R1 pressed their pendant “Announced” 9 times. A response was required, but not received; This alert was never responded to.
On 1/13/2021 at 5:57:59 a.m., R1 pressed their pendant “Announced” 9 times. A response was required, but not received; this alert was never responded to.
Based on interviews which were conducted and record review, facility staff often did not respond in a timely manner when R1 called or pressed their pendant during fall(s), which will be addressed in a case management visit; and, there were at least two occasions in the month of January 2021 that facility staff never responded at all. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation ‘Staff did not respond to residents call button’; as a result, the above allegation is found to be Substantiated.
The following deficiency was observed (See LIC 9099-D.), and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties.
Exit interview conducted, and appeal rights discussed. A copy of the report, and appeal rights were issued. |