1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Failure to provide sufficient care and supervision
It was alleged that at the result of a child residing in the facility, staff are unable to provide sufficient care to residents. In addition, staff were alleged to being on their phone and not focusing on resident care. Interviews conducted confirmed that whereas a child will occasionally interact with the residents, the facility has adequate staffing to ensure that resident needs are met. Records reviewed, including staffing schedules, demonstrate that there are at least two or more staff per shift. A review of resident appraisals and physician reports confirmed that additional staff is not required at this time. The facility maintains at least a 2:6 staffing ratio at all times, which is adequate support given the needs of the residents. A review of incident reports and interviews revealed no direct correlation between resident injury or negligence at the result of unidentified distractions or due to a child being present at this facility.
Resident and staff interviews, and interviews conducted with resident responsible parties negated the claim that staff have been negligent in providing care of residents at this facility. When questioned about the presence of a child in the facility, information obtained from interviews revealed that a child in the facility would not pose a concern and if anything, would bring pleasure to the residents. Based on the investigation, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that staff failed to provide sufficient care and supervision. This allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Regarding the allegation: Failure to provide meals of sufficient quality and quantity
It was alleged that residents are not being fed adequate meals. A review of facility menus details that residents receive three meals a day, not including snacks, and the menu was comprised of varied proteins, fruits, vegetables, and carbohydrates. An unannounced facility tour of the kitchen area revealed varied quantities of perishable and nonperishable food items for resident consumption. The LPA observed both fresh and frozen fruits and vegetables and food was observed to be of good quality at that time. A review of documented weight records for residents did not corroborate the claim that residents have lost substantial weight due to lack of quality food. The LPA could not identify concerns regarding food quality, options, and quantity when conducting interviews. Interviews and records review did not reveal that a resident was prescribed a special diet or supplemental nutrition due to a concern of weight loss. Staff and responsible party interviews, for the most part, noted that resident preferences were taken into consideration when providing meals. Based on the investigation, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that staff failed to provide meals of sufficient quality and quantity. This allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. |