1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Facility staff interfered with resident's right to have a visitor.
It was alleged that the facility impeded on R1’s rights to visitation. Interviews revealed that on approximately 12/26/2021, R1 was asleep when a visitor came to see R1. It was later revealed that R1’s visitor was screened and allowed into the facility and R1’s visitor was informed that R1 was asleep Staff then noted that they were going to bring R1 out to a common space. Interviews revealed that oftentimes, R1 would have visitors in common spaces in the facility. Staff interviews revealed that they had not made claims to R1 or to R1’s visitors that they were unable to have visits in R1’s room or other areas in the facility yet had a designated visitor’s area due to COVID-19. The Administrator confirmed that at that time, they had a designated visitation area per their Mitigation Plan. During this time, R1 was brought out to the common space and R1 and R1’s visitor sat in the front living room. Inconsistent statements were shared regarding interactions that R1’s visitors have had with staff during visits. Staff have noted that if R1 is with a visitor in a common space, staff may have to enter the space for a facility related reason. However, staff claim that they will not intentionally interrupt R1’s visit. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that facility staff interfered with resident's right to have a visitor. R1’s visitor was allowed into the facility on 12/26/2021 and R1 was able to meet with their visitor. This allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Regarding the allegation: Facility staff yelled in front of residents.
It was alleged that the facility staff yelled in front of the residents. Information obtained from interviews revealed that on 12/26/2021, R1 had a visitor come to the facility. Staff claimed that R1’s visitor came into the facility visibly upset and upon meeting the Administrator, the Administrator tried to de-escalate the situation. Inconsistent statements were received regarding the interaction between R1’s visitor and the Administrator. Whereas it was alleged that the Administrator was yelling, witnesses to the incident made claims that R1’s visitor was yelling and that the Administrator was firm in their delivery in responding to R1’s visitor. Interviews confirmed that at the time of the incident there was one other resident sitting in an adjacent living room and witnessed the interactions. Whereas they may have heard yelling, staff confirmed that the yelling was coming from R1’s visitor and not the Administrator. Based on the information obtained, whereas the Administrator admitted to setting firm boundaries with R1’s visitor and was firm in their delivery, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim, that the facility staff yelled in front of residents. This allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Continued on LIC 9099-C |