1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff claimed that when the staff observed the bloody discharge, it was reported to the Administrators. The LPAs could not find documentation supporting the date(s) as to when staff observed the bloody discharge. Records demonstrated that on 12/20/2021, R1's doctor came to the facility due to bloody discharge. The conservator nor the case worker were aware of any bloody discharge until 12/23/2021. Staff admitted to not speaking to R1’s conservator directly and felt that informing the case worker of the incident was sufficient, as they would relay the information to the conservator.
Based on the information obtained, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that staff did not notify conservator of residents change in condition. This allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time.
Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following deficiencies were observed and cited during the visit (See 9099-D).
Exit Interview Conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report has been issued.
|