1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Facility failed to provide resident with privacy. It was alleged that staff members have interrupted resident conversations with visitor’s and failed to provide privacy. Interviews conducted revealed that residents are allowed to have private visitation if requested. In regard to the allegation it is alleged that Resident #1 (R1) is not allowed privacy during visitation. However, R1’s visits primarily take place in common spaces. Staff interviews revealed that they ensure to give residents and their visitors space when in common areas and have advised them of their ability to visit privately in the resident’s rooms if requested. Staff have never denied R1 the ability to have visits in their private room. Residents communicated no concerns as it related to privacy, claimed that staff allow for privacy even when on the phone. A similar allegation was indicated on complaint control # 29-AS-20211103162557, in which the allegation was unsubstantiated on 2/2/2022. Per that investigation, interviews with additional responsible parties of other residents denied claims that their visits had ever been interrupted and stated that staff always respected their privacy when visiting residents in the facility. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the facility failed to provide resident with privacy. This allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
No deficiencies cited regarding the complaint.
Exit interview conducted. Report findings were reviewed with the administrator. The administrator authorized staff to sign the report. A copy of the report was issued. |