1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ***This report serves as an amendment and supersedes the original complaint investigation report created on 06/23/22. The findings remain Unsubstantiated. ***
LPA Tao also obtained R1’s Individual service plan (IPP), R1’s Admission Agreement, R1’s assessment plans, Activities and Outings guidance (December 2020), L.A. County, DPH Activity Protocol, Facility’s Activity Plan for Christmas special event, Dietary Protocol, Alternative Meal Delivery Procedure, Menus (November 29, 2020 - January 2, 2021), Activities Calendar (December 2020), resident#2 (R2)’s Assessment, R2’s Individualized Service Plan (IPP), R2’s Physician’s report, R2’s Move in Notification (6/2/20), R2’s personal rights, R2’s care plan, R2’s narrative charting, Dietary services (1/4/21) during facility’s COVID outbreak, DPH Outbreak Notification letter of COVID – 19 outbreak (12/16/20), and virtually toured the facility which included the kitchen, dining area, and activity room. In addition, LPA interviewed staff#1 (S1) and resident#1 (R1) telephonically.
On 06/23/22, LPA/Retired Annuitant (RA) Elizabeth Ceniceros conducted a subsequent visit at the facility, reviewed resident files and delivered findings. LPA/RA obtained copies of Resident #2 (R2)’s Emergency Identification and Information, R2’s Physician’s Report, R2’s Medication Administration Record, R2’s Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan. LPA/RA toured the facility’s commercial kitchen and dining room area.
On 03/14/23, LPA Tao conducted another subsequent visit. During the visit, LPA obtained copies of staff and resident rosters, reviewed residents’ files, interviewed staff and residents, conducted a facility tour, and delivered findings. LPA interviewed staff from staff #2 (S2) through staff #6 (S6) and residents from resident#2 (R2) to resident#13 (R13).
The investigation consisted of resident interviews, staff interviews, residents’ files review, facility tour, and LPA’s observation.
In regard of allegation, “facility not assisting resident with ADLs (activities of daily living)”, it was alleged that staff did not assist resident #2 (R2) with daily living activities needs and provide social activities. The investigation revealed the following: LPA interviewed resident#1(R1), resident said staff did not assist resident #2 (R2) with daily living activities needs and social activities. Twelve (12) out of thirteen (13) residents, including R2, interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. All staff interviewed denied the allegation. (- continued in LIC 9099 C-) |