1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation 3 - Facility is not providing comfortable accommodations for residents. Interviews conducted with S#1 – S#6, communicated that the facility does provide comfortable accommodations, some of the clients have A/C and the clients that don’t have fans. They just to request a fan and they give it to them. In fact, a lot of the clients already have fans in their rooms. Interviews conducted with R#2 – R#6, communicated that the facility does provide comfortable accommodations. LPA observed some client’s rooms, and some had A/C and the rest of the rooms had fans in their rooms that the facility provided. Some clients did not need A/C or fans, they preferred to open their doors and windows and let the outside air cool them off. The clients had a nice breeze coming into their rooms. The interviews conducted did not concur with above allegation.
Allegation 4 - Facility chairs are in disrepair. Interviews conducted with S#1 – S#6, communicated that the chairs are all in good repair, none of them are broken, the chairs are comfortable, and they have cushions for more comfort. Interviews conducted with R#2 – R#6, communicated that the chairs are not broken, and they are fine to sit. LPA observed the chairs used in the common areas, most of them had cushions, the chairs in the outside patios did not have cushion, but were still comfortable, LPA sat in the outside chairs, they were comfortable, and not broken. The interviews and observations conducted did not concur with above allegation.
Allegation 5 - Staff are not safeguarding residents’ personal belongings. Interviews conducted with S#1 – S#6, communicated that they have never taken anything from any client, and they do not know about client’s clothes ripping, the clients haven’t complained to them about that. They have not stolen clients' belongings neither". Interviews conducted with R#2 – R#6, communicated that staff has never stolen or taken their belongings. LPA reviewed R#1 personal property and valuables, R#1 did not list or provide any property into the facility for safeguarding. The facility was not responsible for safeguard any belongings for R#1. The interviews conducted and records reviewed did not concur with above allegation.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Magdalena Romero, Administrator, and a hard copy of report was provided. This report serves as an amendment to clarify finding. It does not supersedes the complaint investigation findings reflected on report created 07/21/23.
|