1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (medication management $1101.00, chronic condition management $1982.00, nutrition $330, and service coordinator $110.00) for a total of $8402.00. A signature of acknowledgement from (R1's) legal representative (dated: 05/28/24) validated this is a legal contract, and a legal copy was provided to (R1's) legal representative.
On 01/17/24 between 10:00 am - 01:41 pm, the Department interviewed (2) out (2) staff #1-#2 (S1-S2) and stated were both unaware if a request for a statement itemizing all separate charges incurred was ever requested for (R1). (S1-S2), however, provided the Department documentation records for (R1) with the following Residency Agreement (dated: 05/26/23), Assessment Summary (dated: 05/23/23 - 06/20/23, Account History Report (dated: 08/06/23 and 01/17/24), Account Balance Activity (dated: 06/16/23-07/14/23-09/14/23-11-16-23, and 11/30/23) and an internal written communication reference to (R1) were issued.
On 02/02/24 between 11:54 am - 12:12 pm, the Department interviewed staff #3 (S3). (S3) identified in the complaint as the business manager is not the business manager, and (S3's) role is the Clinical Specialist/License Vocational Nurse and had nothing to do with residents' charges. (S3's) role was to assist with residents' care with more complex programs. (S3) claimed there were numerous conversations related to (R1's) personal service but does not recall a request for a statement itemizing all separate charges incurred for (R1). (S3) disclosed the medical assessment was performed before (R1) moved in, and it remained the same throughout (R1's) residency at the facility. (S3) communicated that in no circumstances would additional fees for services would be charged without an agreement with the resident or the resident's legal representative. The Department obtained an internal progress note (dated: 08/10/23) of a discussion on a conference call on 08/09/23 with (R1's) legal representative, (S3), and with former Executive Director. The discussion related to (R1's) Care Plan and Medication Management and the Chronic Condition charges was disputed. There was no mention of a statement request for itemized charges. Based on the information provider, an inspection of the facility, observation, interviews, and analysis of records, the Department found no evidence to support the allegation mentioned above.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, as a result, the allegation is Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Milca Osorio, and a copy of the report was provided. |