1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | R1’s Personal Service Plans (08/21, 11/21, 02/22) revealed R1 needs help in the bathroom. R1’s Personal Service Plan (2023) revealed R1 needs help in the bathroom and is incontinent of bladder. A caregiver will continue to assist resident with completing toileting tasks. R1 has no bowel nor bladder incontinence but uses incontinence products per preference. R1's Physician’s Report (2024) revealed R1 has bladder impairment (frequently) and is unable to meet toileting needs. R1’s Personal Service Plan (10/2024) revealed R1 needs assist with washing up (includes showering) after accidents, changing clothes, laundering soiled clothes and linens. R1 is incontinent of bladder. Personal Service Plan (04/2025) revealed R1 does not require bathroom assistance. R1 is incontinent of bladder. Personal Service Plan (10/2025) revealed R1 is to be reminded to change protective undergarments as needed. R1 is incontinent of bladder.
R1’s Medical Assessment (2026) revealed R1 is bladder incontinence. Personal Service Plan (2026) revealed R1 needs help in the bathroom and is incontinent of bladder.
Interviews revealed the following: Interview with the Executive Director (S1) indicated R1 has a history of refusing services but still receiving the care. On 04/28/26, S1 and the Health & Wellness Director (S6) met with R1 to provide an updated personal service plan. On 07/01/26, a second meeting was held and R1 indicated R1 did not need bathroom assistance but needed staff to wheel R1 into the bathroom and ensure all bathroom items were reachable. The facility gave R1 two weeks to complete the bathroom tasks but R1 still needed the care services. During the trial, S1 learned that the caregivers were still assisting R1 with incontinent care in the bed at night and in the mornings plus changing the bed linen. On 07/05/26, R1 indicated that the bathroom tasks were too much. Five out of five staff interviews (S1, S2, S4, S5, S6) indicated R1 receives toileting assistance. S5 indicated R1 has always needed more care. S6 indicated R1 really needs the maximum bathroom assistance. Five out of five resident interviews (R2 – R6) indicated they receive toileting assistance. Four out of four witnesses (W1 – W2, W4 – W5), responsible parties, indicated the plan of care is accurate.
Regarding the allegation, “Staff falsified the resident's records, ” based on record review and interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has NOT been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
No deficiencies cited.
An exit interview was conducted, and a hard copy of this report was provided to the Executive Director Amanda Monroy. |