1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from 9099
After a later review of the documentation, it was observed that the allegation was substantiated as the eviction notice was not valid as written. Although the incidents described in the eviction notice would be valid for the purpose of eviction, no Incident Reports were submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL). If the incident is serious enough to evict a resident, then it is also reportable to CCL.
In addition, although the Eviction Notice stated that ‘there are several agencies that might help you locate alternate affordable housing’ and to contact you if they would like assistance in identifying those housing, SB 781 requires that the eviction notice actually contains resources to assist the resident in identifying alternative house and care options, including public and private referral services and case management organizations.
On the evening of December 10, 2020 at 7:27 p.m., LPA Miller received a letter rescinding the eviction notice along with a new Appraisal for R1 (LIC 602 Resident Appraisal and a LIC 625 Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan). The administrator further noted a plan that she discussed with R1 to resolve any potential violation of house rules.
Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the following deficiency will be cited (refer to LIC 809-D).
Exit interview conducted/ Appeal rights provided/ A copy of this report was emailed for signature.
|