1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In regards to the allegation "Staff do not have fingerprint clearance" it was alleged that S5 worked at this facility without fingerprint clearance. (4) of (4) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (6) of (6) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Staff interviews stated S5 did work one (1) day at the facility. It was an emergency and due to staff shortage S5 worked. S5 did not return to work at this facility any longer. The exact date was not provided to LPA. Staff was not able to provide LPA fingerprint clearance for S5. Interview stated it is possible S5 had an exempted clearance for working at another facility but was not able to provide that to LPA. This shows the facility failed to verify S5 fingerprint clearance prior to having S5 work at the facility. Based on LPA observations, interviews conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 1), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report, Plan of Correction, and appeal rights were discussed and provided. |