1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | services. During interviews with witnesses, they all denied the allegation to be true. W1 states their family member’s clothing and laundry needs are met. W2 states, “I usually do surprise visits and have not had a sense that there was dirty laundry, anywhere.” W3 states, “actually no, I’m very particular about my relative and if I see something, I usually complain but I have never noticed that. I notice some pieces disappear but that’s it.” LPA did not observe any soiled laundry throughout the facility.
Based on LPA’s observation, interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was given. |