1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | hospital, but it was alleged that the licensee refused and stated they would "forcefully" collect the urine culture. Information received through interviews reveal that R1 was sent to the hospital for treatment and medical attention when R1 did not cooperate with the urine sample. The administrator confirmed this, and adds that R1's primary physician was contacted, and they ordered R1 a new home health agency for treatment. Facility had no further complications with the new home health agency after. They have since ended their service. Since the change in ownership, R1 has continued to stay at the same facility that is under the new ownership (facility #197610079). Furthermore, R1's family expressed no complaints or concern regarding the care and supervision provided. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to prove the allegation of staff failing to seek medical attention and staff failing to follow doctor's orders. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Staff restraining resident:
In regards to the allegation, it was alleged that staff would "forcefully" collect R1's urine culture. Interview with the administrator indicates that facility staff would never restrain a resident, or forcefully make them do something they do not want to do. Interviews with residents and staff could not confirm the allegation. Witnesses, date and time were also not identified to confirm the allegation. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to prove the allegation of staff restraining residents. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. |