1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation, it was alleged that the facility failed to meet R1’s needs, as the facility allegedly cancelled R1’s doctor appointment. Interviews and records review revealed that R1’s health insurance changed, in which R1’s health care plan moved R1 from their current primary care physician to a different physician, whom had no knowledge of R1’s health care needs. R1 was made aware of this; thus, R1 attempted to make a doctor’s appointment with a new physician. However, a review of legal documents confirmed that R1 had a Power of Attorney whom oversaw R1’s health care needs. R1’s POA was aware of the change in physicians, and was working on ensuring that R1 remained with their current physician at the time the complaint was submitted. As such, R1’s POA authorized R1 to only see their current primary care physician, whom was still seeing R1 at that time, despite the changes in R1’s health care plan.
Documentation reiterated that R1’s POA did not want R1 to make any medical appointments and claimed that all medical needs had to be authorized through the POA. A review of R1’s physician report confirmed that it was completed by R1’s current physician, and it was also indicated that R1 was unable to leave the facility unassisted. R1’s POA reiterated that R1’s current primary care physician made visits to the facility to see R1, and that the POA was making arrangements to ensure that all of R1’s medical needs could be met by providers near the facility. The POA also explicitly stated that R1 could not leave unassisted as R1 was considered a flight risk. Whereas R1 may have been scheduling appointments on their own, they were not authorized by the POA.
Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that staff failed to meet R1’s needs. It appeared that R1 was still able to have all medical needs met in a timely manner. Staff made sure to follow the directives of the POA, whom had control of R1’s health care needs. This allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued. |