1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Resident’s hygiene needs are not being met.
The complainant alleges that facility allowed resident to self neglect as she was not assisted with personal hygiene. On page 19 of admissions agreement for resident 7 (R7) it states that assistance with activities of daily living, which includes showering and toileting, is part of basic services that resident signed up for. LPA spoke to Administrator Susana Fuentes, who stated residents are on a shower schedule and those in need of assistance with incontinence are also on a schedule to be checked on regularly. If it is reported that a resident refused a shower, administrator, medtech or office manager verify the refusal of assistance with the resident. R7 was receiving assistance with bathing but not incontinence care. LPA Cifuentes confirmed that R7 is on the shower schedule. LPA interviewed residents (R1-R6) about their hygiene needs. 4 out of 6 stated they received assistance with bathing and that they are given showers twice a week. 1 resident stated they received assistance with incontinence needs and believed staff checked hourly, but that they also pushed the button to get assistance. LPA interviewed staff (S1-S5) about resident hygiene needs and and was told by 5 out of 5 staff that residents are showered twice weekly and that when it comes to incontinence care it depends on the resident, but they are checked several times a day.
Based on information gathered, the Department did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegation mentioned above.
The Department’s investigation consisted of an inspection of the facility, observation, analysis of (R-1)'s service records, incident report, and interviews conducted and found no evidence to support the allegation: “Resident is malnourished”, “Staff sexually abused resident,” “Resident is being physically abused while in care,” “Staff administered incorrect medication to resident,” “Resident’s hygiene needs are not being met”.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations, did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Susie Fuentes and a copy of the report was provided. |