1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff failed to provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents
The complainant alleges that facility does not provide a safe and comfortable environment for the residents. RP stated that second floor rooms have balconies which could be unsafe for Dementia Residents. LPA spoke to Administrator and several staff who stated that all residents with dementia or confusion reside on the first floor of the facility. More independent residents are housed on the second floor. LPA Cifuentes asked Administrator Susie Fuentes about the safety of the facility and providing a comfortable environment for residents. Per Ms. Fuentes, the facility is able to provide both a safe and comfortable environment for its residents. LPA interviewed residents (R1-R8) and asked if they felt safe at the facility. 7 out of 8 stated they felt the facility was safe. LPA interviewed staff (S1-S6) regarding resident safety and comfortability for residents at the facility. 4 out of 6 stated they felt the facility was safe.
Based on information gathered, the Department did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegation mentioned above.
Allegation: Facility is disrepair
The complainant alleges that facilities front door is broken. During visit on 9/15/2021 LPA Cifuentes noted that facility door was locked and had to be opened by staff to allow entry. No glass was broken, nor did it appear bent. LPA spoke to Administrator Susana Fuentes, regarding the facility door. Per Ms. Fuentes, the facility door is not broken, it was not closing on its own, it had to be pushed to close. She further added that the door has been repaired. LPA interviewed residents (R1-R8) regarding the facility door. 7 out of 8 residents stated the facility door is not broken.LPA interviewed staff (S1-S6) about the facility door being broken. Per all six staff interviewed, the facility door is not broken. A few added that it had been broken in the past but had been fixed.
Based on information gathered, the Department did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegation mentioned above.
The Department’s investigation consisted of an inspection of the facility, observation, analysis of (R-1)'s service records, incident report, and interviews conducted and found no evidence to support the allegations.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations, did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Susie Fuentes and a copy of the report was provided. |