1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Regarding the allegation: "Facility does not have an adequate amount of food supply.". It has been alleged that the quality and quantity necessary to meet the needs of the residents does not meet the Recommended Dietary Allowances of the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council.
Between 10:00 and 10:30AM, on 11/06/23, LPA and LTCO observed one residentially sized refrigerator which contained at least 1 days’ worth of perishable food. Between 11:10 and 11:15AM, on 11/06/23, LPA and LTCO observed one large pantry which contained at least 5 days’ worth of non-perishable food. Between 2:15 and 2:20PM, on 11/06/23, LPA and LTCO observed one commercially sized freezer, which contained at least 2 days’ worth of perishable food and 7 days’ worth of non-perishable food.
Interviews revealed that 5 out of 5 staff not have not agreed with the above allegation. Three (3) out of 9 residents have agreed with the above allegation, while 5 out of 9 residents did not agree with the allegation. Additionally, one (1) resident was unconcerned about the amount of food being provided.
Record reviews revealed that the food being purchased for, and provided to the facility was at least 2 days' worth of perishable and 7 days' worth of non-perishable food, which met the recommended dietary allowances provided by the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council.
Based on LPA’s observations, record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Juan Rossell, building manager, and a copy of this report has been provided.
|