1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: "Staff are not meeting resident's feeding needs." Based on document review and interviews conducted the findings indicate that on December 9, 2021 resident (R1) was not provided feeding assistance during dinner time in a timely manner. The resident is receiving hospice services and is unable to feed its self. The resident typically gets the dinner tray delivered to the room at 4:30 pm. It is alleged that it was 6:15 PM and the resident had not received any feeding assistance. The resident requires total care. Staff stated that on December 9, 2021 the resident had a bowel movement prior to dinner time and was subsequently changed into pajama bottoms because after dinner time the resident is transferred back to the bed. Staff (S2)/caregiver stated that the resident refused to eat; therefore staff decided to return at a later time to try to feed the resident again. Per staff, there is a microwave in the room and food is reheated if it is cold.
According to staff interviews, hospice care instruction is to try to feed the resident as much food as possible, but the resident has been declining in health and it's appetite has decreased. Staff are instructed to return to a resident's room within 20-30 minutes after a resident refuses to eat. On the date aforementioned staff did not return within 20-30 minutes. They returned close to 2 hours later and the resident had not been fed. Document review revealed that resident (R1) requires total ADL assistance and has cognitive impairment. A total of eight (8) residents were interviewed, none reported their feeding needs are not met. However, per resident (R1's) Physician Report, Hospice Care Plan, and Appraisal Needs and Services Plan resident (R1) requires feeding assistance; which was not provided in a timely manner on December 9, 2021.
Allegation: "Resident's pendent was not accessible to the resident." Based on interviews conducted the findings indicate that on December 9, 2021 resident (R1) did not have an accessible pendant to call staff for assistance. All residents, with the exception of Memory Care Unit residents are provided a pendant necklace that calls for help. When resident (R1) was transferred from the bed to the wheelchair for dinner time the pendant was not given to the resident. The pendant was tied to the bed, inaccessible to the resident. Staff interviews revealed that the pendant was left by mistake on the resident's bed. Residents that were interviewed did not report any issues with pendant accessibility. But in regards to this allegation resident (R1) was not provided the pendant when it was transferred to the wheelchair. Resident (R1) does not reside in the Memory Care Unit; therefore is provided a pendant per admission agreement and care plan.
Based on record review and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22.
An exit interview was conducted with Business Office Manager Gina Lopez. A copy of the report an appeal rights were provided. |