1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff are blocking doorways in the facility. During this investigation, LPA interviewed staff and residents. R-1 refused to be interviewed. Staff interviews revealed that on 06/04/22, the night shift staff placed large tree planters blocking the front doors to camouflage the door due to night homeless activity nearby the facility. Staff interviews corroborate this allegation.
Allegation: Staff are leaving residents unattended while in care. During this investigation, LPA interviewed staff and residents. R-1 refused to be interviewed. Staff interviews revealed that on 06/04/22, there were only (2) staff working on the night shift instead of (4) staff. Per staff interviews, there were (2) staff members that did not work as scheduled on 06/04/22 (front desk and medication technician) and coverage was not obtained. Per interviews, there is a front desk staff during the day and another from 12 A.M to 8 A.M.. Per interviews, on 06/04/22, R-2 called the local Fire Department for assistance on behalf of R-1. Per staff interviews, there was no front desk staff during the night shift (after 12 A.M.) on 06/04/22 and they learned that R-2 had called and allowed the local Fire Department have access to this building to assist R-1. Interviewed staff indicated they learned that the local Fire Department was inside this building when the local Fire Department personnel began calling staff through the front desk walkie talkie. Per staff interviews, the front desk staff is responsible to provide building access after business hours. Per R-2 interview, R-2 opened the front door for the local Fire Department. Per interviews, the local Fire Department attended to R-1 and searched for staff and staff were not nearby and were contacted by the local Fire Department via walkie talkie. nterviewed staff indicated they do not sleep during their shift. Interviews corroborate this allegation.
Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22
Exit interview conducted, appeal rights and a copy of this report was provided to S-2 |