1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | transferred to the skilled nursing facility (SNF) due to their inability to eat independently, and did not received their belongings.
The investigation revealed the following: In the interview with R1 it was revealed that “everything has been resolved and there is no need for you (LPA) to visit the facility.” In an interview with Denise Davenport, Chief Domiciliary Services, it was revealed there have been no evictions within the past 90 days. She states R1 was moved to a SNF due to resident having a fall and the need for rehabilitation. Davenport states resident was never separated from their belongings, was on a “bed hold” and was scheduled to return to the RCFE once rehabilitation was completed. She states resident had access to their belongings for the duration of their stay within the SNF and would “come back and forth to bring things over.” She states while resident was in the care of the SNF it was discovered that the resident was displaying signs of having difficulties eating independently. Per record review, resident was evaluated on 06/08/2021, and monitored until they were cleared to return to the RCFE on 09/27/2021.
During a record review, LPA observed a supporting incident report was submitted by the facility stating that the resident had a fall while in the community on 04/25/2021 which resulted in R1 dislocating and fracturing their right shoulder and the requirement for rehabilitation.
Based on LPA’s observation, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated.
Exit interview conducted, and a copy of the report was given to Denise Davenport, Chief Domiciliary Services |