1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation #2: Staff mismanaging residents’ medication.
It was alleged that staff wanted to increase the resident’s medication. On 6/22/2020, medical records revealed that doctor had order an increase in R1’s medication Seroquel (Quetiapine) from 25mg to 1.5 tablets 3 times a day and then reevaluate. Medication order was schedule to start 6/22/20-7/15/20. On 6/25/2020 and 9/23/2020, Investigator conducted interviews with Administrator and Staff members, S1-S5. Staff members stated R1’s behavior was aggressive and was hard to monitor resident in the facility. Staff stated R1 would leave isolation room instead of quarantine and would wander the facility and jeopardize other residents. Staff stated R1 would be redirected but will be combative. Staff stated was aware of medication increase and was directed to check resident every 2 hours. Interviews and documents revealed the following: On 6/16/2020, records showed that, R1 tested positive for Covid-19. On 6/16/2020, a meeting was held by telephone with administrator and witnesses (W1 and W2) to discuss R1’s care plan, due to behavior changes. During meeting conversation administrator, W1 and W2 have all agreed to increase R1’s medication. On 6/16/2020, medical record notes from physician were documented that W2 stated R1 is being combative and having a hard time in isolation. Administrator, W1 and W2, have agreed to increase medication. On 6/21/2020, it was noted that R1 would leave the isolation room and wander. On 6/21/20, incident took place that R1 left the isolation room through a sliding glass door on the balcony. R1 entered a neighboring resident's room and had wandered into the hallway. On 6/22/2020, staff was notified of changes to increase medication. LPA reviewed R1 medication records for the month of June 2020. Investigation revealed that on 6/25/20-6/26/20 the medication Quetiapine was on hold for 2 days and not given to R1. LPA did not see any directives to hold medication from R1.
Based on records review and interviews, it was determined that R1’s medication was mismanaged, and the above allegation is substantiated.
Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, and a hard copy was provided.
|