1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The details of the complaint alleged that the facility does not have a current administrator; and that the prior administrator resigned on 03/20/2024. On 05/09/24, from 9:30am-12:00pm, LPA interviewed staff (S1-S4) and residents (R1-R4) regarding the allegation. 4 of 4 staff (S1-S4) confirmed the allegation that the Licensee does not ensure that the facility has an administrator. All staff stated that there was not an administrator at the facility. S1 stated that S1 was an acting Administrator from 03/18/2024-04/12/2024. S2, Licensee Representative, stated that there is not a current administrator for the facility, however a new administrator is scheduled to start on 05/16/24.
LPA interviewed residents R1-R4 about the allegation that Licensee does not ensure that the facility has an administrator. 4 of 4 residents that were interviewed confirmed that there was not an administrator onsite for the facility. LPA observed that from 04/12/24 through 05/16/24 the facility will not have an active administrator onsite.
Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation: Licensee does not ensure that the facility has an administrator, is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division (6) and chapter (8) are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Deficiencies are issued and plans of corrections were discussed.
An exit interview was conducted with Saul Nieto, Receptionist. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.
Note: *Citations not cleared by the due date will be a $100 fine assessed for each citation until it is cleared. Civil penalties will continue to accrue until Proof of Corrections (POC) is cleared. *
|