1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interview with R1 confirmed that the facility obtained cigarettes after R1 had provided the facility with money. They also confirmed that staff assisted them once to twice a day in the evenings by going outside and smoking. R1 reported that they only request to go outside for a smoke about twice a day. R1 stated that utilizing the pull cord around their arm is sufficient in the meantime due to the facility not providing other accommodations. R1 raised concerns about the pull cord being accessible only when they are in bed and when their wheelchair is positioned close to the call button system. However, if they were further away, they would not be able to utilize the system and request for staff assistance.
Interview with the ED revealed attempts to provide alternatives for R1’s pull cord which included attaching a lanyard to R1’s arm and obtaining a push button pendant. Due to R1’s condition, R1 stated they would not be capable of utilizing a pendant and it was reported that R1 also refused the lanyard alternative. The ED stated that R1 often refused assistance and redirection from staff and frequently changed their mind when they made requests. The ED expressed difficulty with finding accommodations for R1’s pull cord system, but that they were actively working on solving the issue.
On 01/13/2026, the facility consulted with a Physical Therapist (PT) to assess R1’s mobility and alternatives to the call system. The PT noted that R1 has some strength for movement in their elbow, hand, and fingers to utilize the pull cord. Furthermore, R1 was confirmed to adequately pull the cord in addition to pushing the button on a pendant to trigger the call system.
Based on interview and record review, R1 confirmed assistance with smoking and was provided alternatives to the call system; however, they refused those alternatives and requested for staff to attach the pull cord around their arm. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
No deficiency cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was reviewed and provided. |