<meta name="robots" content="noindex">
Department of
SOCIAL SERVICES

Community Care Licensing


COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT

Facility Number: 197608180
Report Date: 08/13/2026
Date Signed: 08/13/2026 12:41:51 PM

Unsubstantiated


STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
MONTEREY PARK ASC, 1000 CORPORATE CNTR DR. ST 500
MONTEREY PARK, CA 91754
This is an official report of an unannounced visit/investigation of a complaint received in our office on
08/06/2026 and conducted by Evaluator Mayra Cota
PUBLIC
COMPLAINT CONTROL NUMBER: 28-AS-20260806151134
FACILITY NAME:SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING - THE HUNTINGTONFACILITY NUMBER:
197608180
ADMINISTRATOR:ROCHELLE CARPIOFACILITY TYPE:
740
ADDRESS:1118 N STONEMAN AVETELEPHONE:
(626) 308-9777
CITY:ALHAMBRASTATE: CAZIP CODE:
91801
CAPACITY:62CENSUS: 59DATE:
08/13/2026
UNANNOUNCEDTIME BEGAN:
08:45 AM
MET WITH:Rochelle Carpio, AdministratorTIME COMPLETED:
12:45 PM
ALLEGATION(S):
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Staff do not ensure that residents are able to enter and exit the facility.
INVESTIGATION FINDINGS:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Mayra Cota, conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit to investigate the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Elizabeth Cruces, Office Services Manager, and the reason for the visit was explained. Rochelle Carpio, Administrator, arrived thereafter and continued to facilitate the investigation.

The investigation consisted of the following:

LPA, obtained copies of staff and resident rosters, toured the facility with a particular focus on inspecting the front door and interviewed Staff 1 – Staff 5 (S1-S5). LPA attempted to conduct interviews with residents at random; however, was unable to obtain information regarding the allegation. *Note: the facility serves cognitively impaired elderly residents.

The investigation revealed the following:
***Continues on LIC 9099-C***
Unsubstantiated
Estimated Days of Completion:
SUPERVISORS NAME: Wei Siew Ho
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Mayra Cota
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/13/2026
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/13/2026
This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years.
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 1 of 2
Control Number 28-AS-20260806151134
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
MONTEREY PARK ASC, 1000 CORPORATE CNTR DR. ST 500
MONTEREY PARK, CA 91754
FACILITY NAME: SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING - THE HUNTINGTON
FACILITY NUMBER: 197608180
VISIT DATE: 08/13/2026
NARRATIVE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Regarding: Staff do not ensure that residents are able to enter and exit the facility.

It is alleged that the front door is locked at random times and no one can get in or out without a buzzer. It is also alleged that sometimes the wait is over ten minutes during the day, making it hard to deliver and creating a fire hazard.

Interviews with (5) out of (5) staff revealed that the front door is not locked at random times and it is not a fire hazard. Staff indicated that although the facility is a “closed facility” due to being full Memory Care, there are protocols in place for people to come in and out of the facility during normal business hours and evening shifts to ensure the safety of residents in care. Staff further stated that all residents living in the facility are not restricted from entering and exciting the facility; however, could only leave the premises with a chaperon after being signed-out at the front desk as part of the safety measures the facility has in place. Interviews with Staff 1 – Staff 3 (S1-S3) revealed that the front desk always has staff monitoring the door Monday – Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday, 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. to “buzz” people in and out of the facility when the “doorbell” in the front door is triggered. Visitors coming in and out of the facility after business hours must follow the same protocol of using the front “doorbell” to alert staff. Nurses working the PM shifts have portable phones which are alerted when visitors trigger the “doorbell” by the front door to gain access into the building. Staff stated that service providers who may come to the facility after hours can call the facility’s main phone line if they need access to facility. Staff indicated that the front door is locked from the outside, but not from the inside because the door is equipped with a delay egress system which triggers an alarm after 30 seconds after the door is opened to alert staff of a possible elopement. Staff indicated that their food and medical equipment vendors do not deliver after hours because they have a set schedule that they follow for deliveries to be made during regular business hours. Shipping retailers leave packages outside of the main entranceway and do not request access to the inside of the building when delivering packages. Staff indicated that although there have been times in which visitors have waited several minutes to be provided with access into the facility by staff, wait times do not exceed ten minutes. Staff further indicated that they have not received any reports regarding people not being able to get in or out of the facility or having to wait for more than ten minutes to be granted access inside. LPA inspected the front door and observed the delay egress system to be working properly. The “buzzer” in the front desk was also tested and found it to be operational.

Interviews and observations could not corroborate the allegation that staff are not ensuring that residents are able to exit and enter the facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Rochelle Carpio, Administrator, and a copy of this report was provided.

SUPERVISORS NAME: Wei Siew Ho
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Mayra Cota
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/13/2026
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 08/13/2026
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 2 of 2