1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Staff did not seek medical attention for resident in care. It was alleged that R1 was not provided with medical attention. To investigate the allegation, LPA interviewed two (2) staff members and attempted to interview seven (7) residents. LPA’s interview with both staff members revealed that when they were made aware of R1 seeking treatment, they attempted to assist them but R1 declined. S2 stated that when they asked R1 if they required, “…medical attention…” R1 stated they did not want any. LPA attempted to interview R1 but R1 was not present during the visit and could not be reached. LPA’s interview with six (6) out of the seven (7) residents confirmed that if they needed medical attention the facility would provide such services.
Based on interviews, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Regarding the allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from harming another resident in care. It was alleged that R1 was physically assaulted by R2 and staff did not prevent the altercation from occurring. To investigate the allegation, LPA interviewed two (2) staff members and attempted to interview eight (8) residents. LPA’s interview with both staff members revealed that R2 did not have a history of aggressive behaviors towards other residents, however R1 has had a history of aggressive behavior towards other residents. Interview with S1 revealed that when they became aware of a possible incident occurring between R1 and R2, they self-reported the incident on an Unusual Incident/Injury Report (SIR). LPA’s interview with S2 revealed that they removed R2 from their shared living space to help mediate the situation. Both staff members stated that R2 denied that they had physically assaulted R1.
LPA’s interview with two (2) out of the eight (8) residents confirmed that they have had prior incidents involving R1’s aggressive behavior. Interview with R3 revealed that R1 would become upset with them and had even once restricted their access into shared spaces within the facility. Interview with R4 confirmed that they too had prior incidents regarding R1’s behavior. R4 stated that R1 always wanted to fight them and would, “threaten” them all the time. Interview with R3 and R4 confirmed that the facility did ensure to minimize said incidents by removing them away from R1 to ensure all could coexist safely. LPA’s interview with R5 revealed that their interactions with R2 were always amicable. LPA attempted to interview R2 but R2 no longer resides at the facility and could not be contacted. LPA attempted to interview R1, but they were not present during the visit and could not be contacted. LPA’s interview with R6, R7 and R8 revealed that they have not had any interactions with R1 and R2. LPA’s record review confirmed that the facility did report the incident to Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). (Continue to LIC 9099-C)
|