1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation that the facility is not meeting residents' dietary needs, the investigation consisted of review of facility menu and snack menu, and review of list of residents' who have special dietary needs. Administrator and staff interviewed denied the allegation. Administrator stated that the facility has a contract with a catering company who delivers the residents meals. Administrator stated that the food that is provided to residents is in accordance with meeting the residents' dietary needs. Administrator stated that residents usually sit in the same area in the dining room, and the dining staff know which residents have special dietary needs. LPA observed that there is a list of residents, and their dietary needs are indicated on the list.
Based on LPA's observations and interviews, investigation revealed: Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
No Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of report was provided to Administrator, Jean Kim. |