1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | S2 stated that R1 had a problem with biting R1’s fingers and caused a wound. We let the hospice know and they sent a wound nurse that was treating R1’s injuries. When a family member heard of the problem with biting, the family member wanted to have all R1’s teeth removed but the doctor decided against that. Additionally, S2 stated that we monitored R1 closely, as did the wound care nurse who treated R1’s wounds. LPA interviewed R1-R7 about the allegation and 6 of 7 residents that were interviewed denied the allegation that the Facility staff did not provide resident with adequate care for self-inflicted injury. Residents stated that the staff are responsive and seek medical attention for them if they have injured themselves and take appropriate measures to get them help. LPA reviewed the preplacement appraisal, and it states the resident has a history of grinding R1’s teeth and biting R1’s fingers.
Based on interviews, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that Facility staff did not provide resident with adequate care for self-inflicted injury. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated.
Allegation # 4- Facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident.
The details of the complaint alleged that the facility did not seek timely medical attention for R1 because when R1 was admitted to the hospital R1 had an infected wound due to a self-inflicted injury and was diagnosed with a urinary infection that is believed to be caused by lack of food and water. On 03/22/24, from 09:00am-02:00pm, LPA interviewed staff (S1-S5) and residents (R1-R7) regarding the allegation. R1 could not be interviewed because R1 has passed away. However, a family member of R1 was interviewed. 2 of 5 staff denied the allegation that Facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident, while the other three (S3-S5) staff stated that they did not know the resident because the resident was not here when they were hired. S1-S2 stated that the resident received regular medical attention. There was a hospice care team, wound care nurse, and staff that assisted with the residents’ activities of daily living. LPA reviewed the LIC602A (Physicians Report) that showed the resident was incontinent and had a bladder impairment and bowel impairment, which can cause a urinary tract infection. LPA reviewed the Turning and Repositioning logs which showed the staff were changing R1’s incontinence briefs regularly.
LPA interviewed R1-R7 about the allegation and 6 of 7 residents that were interviewed denied the allegation that the Facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident. Residents stated that they did not have any issues with the staff getting them timely medical attention when needed.
Based on interviews and records reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that Facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated.
No deficiencies were cited.
An exit interview was conducted with Ronald Libiran, Manager, and a copy of this report was provided.
|