1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation that staff #1 spoke to resident inappropriately, the investigation consisted of Interview(s) with Administrator, Staff #1, Staff #2, and Resident #1 - Resident #5. Administrator and staff interviewed denied the allegation. Staff #1 stated that she did not speak to resident inappropriately. Staff #2 stated that she was a witness to the conversation between Resident #1 and Staff #1, and denied that Staff #1 spoke inappropriately to resident. Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. They stated that staff do not speak to residents inappropriately.
Based on LPA's observations and interviews, investigation revealed: Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
No Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of report was provided to Administrator, Peter Babaian. |