1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation- Staff failed to prevent resident from AWOL’ing from facility.
During interviews conducted with administrator, assistant administrator, and S1, (3) of (3) staff state that the majority of the residents are allowed to leave the facility unassisted. The residents who require assistance are transported in the facility vehicle by staff or by their responsible parties. Staff interviewed stated they did not fail to prevent residents from AWOL'ing from the facility. After review of R1's records, it was discovered that R1 was able to leave the facility unassisted, per R1's physician's report. After review of the facility's Plan of Operations, it was discovered that the policy indicates that all residents are encouraged to sign out and sign in upon their return at the log that is kept at the reception desk. During interviews conducted with R2-R6, (5) of (6) residents state they are aware of the facility policy to report anytime they leave/return to the facility.
Allegation- Staff is admitting residents who need a higher level of care.
During interviews conducted with administrator, assistant administrator, and S1, (3) of (3) staff stated all residents, prior to being admitted to the facility, go through a series of evaluations and interviews to determine compatibility with current residents and the care needs that the facility provides, per the facility's Plan of Operations- Intake Procedure for Placement in an RCFE. Staff interviewed stated they do not admit residents who need a higher level of care. During interviews conducted with R2-R6, it was stated that (6) of (6) residents feel that the facility has compatibility between current residents and their care needs. Residents interviewed stated that all staff assist them with their needs. After review of C1's records, it was discovered at C1 met the criteria stated in the intake procedure for placement at the facility, per the facility's plan of operations.
Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with administrator Peter Babaian and a copy of the report was provided. |