1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from 9099
LPA conducted a second subsequent visit; at which time, LPA conducted interviews with additional staff, former staff and a family member of R1. LPA also reviewed and obtained copies of additional documents pertinent to the investigation.
On 03/23/2022, the case was referred to Community Care Licensing Divisions Investigations Branch (IB) to obtain the forensic exam results and police report pertaining to R1. On 04/08/2022, IB Investigator Sonia Sandoval received and reviewed forensic exam records from the Rape Treatment Center. Moreover, on 05/03/2022, IB Investigator Sonia Sandoval received and reviewed police report from Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD). After numerous attempts 1/21/2020 at 2:30pm , 3/16/2022 at 1:30pm, 4/21/2022 at 4:30pm, 4/23/2022 at 3pm,to contact S1, on 05/27/2022, between 2:30p.m. and 4:00p.m., LPA interviewed S1.
Information gathered during the course of the investigation revealed that no current or former staff has ever witnessed S1 sexually abuse R1. The IB investigator’s review of the forensic exam records from the Rape Treatment Center revealed that on 04/05/2019, a forensic exam was conducted on R1, which resulted in no positive findings that a rape had occurred. Interview with a family member of R1 revealed that R1 was admitted into the hospital on approximately 04/05/2019, for an infection in their private area. The family member stated that hospital staff informed them that there was no physical evidence, such as abrasions or tissue damage on R1, to indicate that sexual abuse had occurred. Furthermore, hospital discharge records revealed there was not enough evidence to confirm that sexual abuse had occurred.
Belmont Village Hollywood management, which included Executive Director and Human Resources conducted an internal investigation, which included interviewing sixteen (16) staff members who had worked with S1 and R1. Per records reviewed, facility internal investigation concluded on 04/19/2019. Additionally, a review of the internal investigation revealed that S1 denied all allegations of sexual abuse against R1. Based on all information gathered during the internal investigation facility was unable to substantiate the allegation.
Furthermore, the IB Investigator’s review of LAPD police report revealed that R1 was unresponsive to LAPD officer’s questions during their investigation. The LAPD officer was informed by R1’s family member that due to R1’s diagnosis, R1 did not respond to anyone. The family member further revealed to the officer that R1 was admitted to the hospital due to an unusual discharge from R1’s private area. The report also indicated that approximately four (4) months ago, R1 was experiencing the same unusual discharge and treated for an infection. |