1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from 9099
Interviews conducted with twelve (12) staff revealed that all (12) staff have never observed R1's belt appear to not be tightened properly. Each staff has also observed R1 to be dressed appropriately such as wearing multiple layers while outside the facility when the temperature was cooler or wearing thin layers while inside the facility when the temperature is warmer. LPA's interview with eight (8) family members / responsible parties of residents currently in care revealed that all eight (8) did not express any potential or immediate concerns that staff would not dress residents appropriately or properly. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Staff does not ensure that resident is appropriately dressed” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
It was reported that Staff does not ensure that resident's hygiene needs are met, as it was alleged that staff were not ensuring R1 was showered in a timely manner. LPA’s records review reflected that R1 needed (2) person assist with showers, showered at least twice a week with assistance from Hospice, and was also showered upon request or when it was necessary. Records review of daily progress notes further revealed there did not appear to be any instances of R1 refusing to shower. LPA's interview with (12) twelve staff revealed that all (12) staff have observed R1 appear to be well kept, clean and each staff interviewed did not associate any foul odor with R1. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Staff does not ensure that resident's hygiene needs are met” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
It was reported that Facility staff did not complete an inventory of R1's personal items, as it was alleged that at the time of admission an inventory of R1's personal items was never completed. Interviews conducted and records review reflected that R1's Resident Personal Property and Valuables (LIC 621) had indicated that the POA signed the form on 08/24/2022 and they did not want the facility to safeguard any of R1's personal items. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Facility staff did not complete an inventory of R1's personal items” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. |