1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegations: Medications are not being self-administered as prescribed. Medication records are not being documented correctly. The Complainant indicated that facility staff did not assistance with medications as prescribed or did not log medications properly. The information obtained during the investigation included copies of the Medication and Administration Record (MAR) for two (2) residents. Interview with Resident #1 (R1) did not reveal any concerns with medication management. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Regarding the allegations: Resident is not being provided assistance with transportation. Residents are not receiving appropriate care. Staff is retaliating against resident. The Complainant indicated that facility staff did not properly care of the residents in care. No additional information was given. Interviews available did not provide additional evidence or information. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Regarding the allegations: Unlawful Eviction. The Complainant indicated that an outside individual, not facility staff threatened an eviction to Resident #2 (R2). Interviews available did not provide additional evidence or information. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued to the former licensee via mail for signature. |