1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In regard to the allegation “Licensee is preventing resident from seeing a doctor of their choice”, it is alleged that staff is forcing residents to be seen by the facility house doctor. During interviews with staff five (5) out of five (5) staff stated that all residents had a choice of to what doctor residents want to see. S2 states they have residents that see their own doctors. During interviews with residents four (4) out of five (5) residents stated they can pick their own doctors. R1 stated he/she has their own doctor and does not see house doctor.
In regard to the allegation “Staff are not adequately trained”, It is alleged that a resident was choking, and staff did not know how to perform the Heimlich maneuver. During interviews with staff five (5) out of five (5) staff stated that all employees are CPR/FIRST AID trained and that they have never witnessed a resident preforming Heimlich on another resident. LPA obtained copies of CPR training for five (5) staff members. During interviews with residents four (4) out of five (5) residents felt staff is properly trained.
In regard to the allegation “Staff did not keep the facility free of cockroaches and Staff did not keep the facility free of bedbugs”, it is alleged that facility has cockroaches and bedbugs. During interviews with staff four (4) out of five (5) stated they are aware of the bed bug/cockroach problem, but the facility has been addressing the issues with rodent and pest services monthly for the last six months. LPA obtained all invoices for last six months. During interviews with residents five (5) out of five (5) all confirmed that they spray the facility every month.
In regard to the allegation “Staff exposed residents to chemicals that are hazardous”, it is alleged that when the exterminator comes to spray residents are moved to another room that had just been sprayed. During interviews with staff five (5) out of five (5) stated that residents need to go outside on the patio area or in the dining room that was treated hours before. Staff stated some residents are mad because they want to go back to their bedrooms right away. During interviews with residents three (3) out of five (5) residents don’t feel that that they are being exposed to hazardous chemicals. R2 stated that he/she had only been at facility for a month and was unaware of spraying. R1 stated that it made no sense to not let them back in to their bedrooms.
Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given to Supervisor Roxana Aparicio.
|