1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Insufficient staffing to meet resident’s needs
The complainant alleged that there have been multiple incidents where the home was understaffed and unable to meet 1:1 staffing ratio as required. Of the four clients that reside in the facility in November 2021, the facility has two individuals that require 1:1 staffing (Client #1, Client #2). A review of C1’s Individual Program Plan (IPP) and an interview with C1’s service coordinator confirmed that in addition to the 1:1 staffing requirement for C1, C1 needs an additional staff eight (8) hours a day, Monday through Friday, to assist with transfers. As such, C1 needs two persons to assist with transfers to ensure C1’s safety. Lastly, C2’s Individual Program Plan (IPP) document dated 1/12/2022 noted that C2 no longer required 1:1 care.
Staff interviews revealed that when staff called off, other staff were asked to cover or work double shifts. If staff commented that there was an understaffing issue, it was because the same staff were being asked to work overtime, which may indicate that the facility needs more staff. Staff interviews confirmed that at the time the complaint was submitted to the Department, the facility had experienced a lot of call outs, staff admitted that there typically are two persons working during a shift, and some staff claimed to have worked alone during NOC shift, despite the scheduling sheet. A review of schedules for the week of 11/29/2021-12/5/2021 revealed that on 11/29/2021, there were only two staff for the AM shift and only two staff for the PM shift. On 12/1/2021 and 12/5/2021, there were only two staff for the PM shift. Given the needs for clients that required 1:1 care, the facility needed at least three staff for the AM and PM shift, and an additional staff to assist with transfers for C1. The majority of staff confirmed that they had transferred C1 alone due to the lack of staffing. Based on the information obtained, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the facility staff failed to be in the required staffing ratio. This allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time.
The following deficiencies were observed (See LIC 9099-D.) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties.
Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided via email.
|