1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | which will be UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Allegation # 2: Authorized representative did not receive a signed admissions agreement. On 05/20/2021, 09/16/2021, and 11/01/2022, from various times, ranging from 930am to 330pm, LPA reviewed resident records, and conducted interviews with the complainant, staff, and resident #1 (R1). Concerns were expressed after R1 was admitted to the facility, the POA (Power of Attorney) did not receive the admission agreement in a timely manner. Information revealed to LPA, and documentation received, it was reported to LPA by the Administrator, that due to the POA residing in another country, there was minimal contact and all facility documents had to be completed and signed via email. LPA received those documents and based on review, it was observed that the Administrator submitted the admission agreement with her initials, and were eventually signed by the POA and submitted to Administrator. Therefore, based on record review and interviews, LPA does not have sufficient evidence to prove the allegation, and it is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Allegation # 3: Staff did not keep resident's personal information confidential. On 05/20/2021, 09/16/2021, and 11/01/2022, from various times, ranging from 930am to 330pm, LPA reviewed resident records, and conducted interviews with the complainant, staff, and resident #1 (R1). There were concerns resident's personal and confidential information is being disclosed in front of other residents. LPA conducted interviews, including R1, and it was reported to LPA they have not observed any such conduct from staff or others. Conversations are disclosed privately amongst staff and residents in a safe environment. Therefore, based on interviews, LPA determined there is insufficient evidence to prove the allegation, and it is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Exit interview and copy of report provided. |