1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: The facility only admits residents based on race
The allegation alleges that the facility turned away clientele who inquired about moving in and were denied based on race.
During record review, LPA received and reviewed an Admission Packet which is given to perspective residents. In the packet is the facility’s Anti-Discrimination Policy that states "It is the policy and practice of Sunny Hills Assisted Living and Memory Care and its agents and employees not to engage in housing discrimination based on a current or prospective resident’s race, color, national, origin, religion, sex, familial status, disability or any other classification protected by applicable federal, state or local law." Additionally in the packet is Personal Rights in Privately Operated Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly that states in number (4) To be encouraged and assisted in exercising their rights as citizens and as residents of the facility. Residents shall be free from interference, coercion, discrimination, and retaliation in exercising their rights. LPA additionally received and reviewed the facility’s multilingual brochures. LPA observed the brochure has multiracial photos. During the facility inspection, LPA observed multilingual signs posted throughout the facility, including the menu, activity schedule, and other required postings.
LPA received and reviewed staff In-Service training logs dated 10/20/2023 and 10/14/2022, on the topic of the facility’s Non-Discrimination Policy.
During interviews with Staff S1-S7, were asked if they have heard of or know of a person inquiring about the facility that was turned away based on race, gender, color, marital status, or national origin, seven (7) out of seven (7) stated no, not that they have knowledge of. Additionally, Staff S1-S7 were asked if they have turned a person away who was inquiring about the facility based on race, gender, color, marital status, or national origin, seven (7) out of seven (7) stated no, they have not turned any inquiring persons away. During an interview with Staff S1, stated when they became the administrator they had multilingual brochures made so they could expand their advertising to all communities.
During interviews with Residents R1-R8’s Responsible Party’s Witnesses W1-W7, were asked if they were told the facility is a Korean facility only, seven (7) out of seven (7) stated no, they were not told the facility was a Korean facility.
During the course of the investigation, LPA was unable to find evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
LPA did not observe or cite any deficiencies.
An exit interview was conducted with Reception, Chan Sook Koo, and a copy of this report was provided. |