1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on the LPA's investigation, the investigation revealed the following:
For Allegation #1 – Staff relocated resident without permission. Interview with Administrator, she stated that R#1 did agree to change facilities. She spoke to R#1 about the other facility (Eilat’s Manor) how Much R#1 would like to live there and R#1, would still have everything R#1 had there at Beit Shalom. The bedroom and shower would bigger to accommodate R#1 and wheelchair. According to Administrator R#1 agreed to try It. LPA Soto requested copies of form signed where R#1 agreed to the change. Administrator failed to provide the form to LPA Soto. Interviews with R#1 and W#1, stated that R#1 did not want to move, R#1 wanted to stay at Beit Shalom. Interviews with S#2 & S#3, stated that they were not aware of anyone moving facilities without their consent. Interviews with R#1 – R#3, LPA Soto could not interview residents, due to the residents not available to interview at the time of visit. The interviews conducted concurred with the above allegation.
Based on LPA’s observations and interviews which were conducted and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated.
According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), LPA observed the following deficiency and issued a citation.
Telephonic exit interview was conducted with Miriam Rudes, and a hard copy was provided via email for signature and Appeal Rights provided
|