1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC 9099...
It was alleged that licensee retaliated against resident. It was reported that shortly after Resident #1 (R1) had returned to the facility, R1’s family had received a notice that rates were being increased. Information obtained and records reviewed revealed that R1 was admitted to the facility on 08/31/2021. Records review revealed that R1 has had an annual increase for the last consecutive three (3) years, and R1 has been receiving notice for increase in monthly fees at about the same time every year at least sixty (60) days before the annual increase will take in effect for the following year. These notices were sent to both the resident as well as their responsible party. Furthermore, the annual monthly increase was not only sent to R1, but to many other residents currently residing at the facility. Based on the information obtained and reviewed, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to support the allegation of “licensee retaliated against resident”. Therefore, this allegation is being deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
It was also alleged that facility staff failed to bathe resident. It was reported that Resident #2 (R2) was supposed to be bathed twice a week, but the facility neglected R2’s care. Records review of R2’s physician’s report dated 08/18/2021 indicated R2’s primary diagnosis is Alzheimer’s disease and has no capacity for self-care requiring assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL’s). Interviews conducted with staff revealed that showers are included for all memory care residents. All memory care residents have scheduled shower rotation twice a week and for R2, their shower rotation was scheduled for Tuesdays and Thursdays. Additionally, shower sheets are filled out for each resident after each resident has been showered. Additionally, during an interview with R2’s family member, they reported that R2 was always clean, and the facility was still taking care of R2 and bathing R2 twice a week while they were out of the facility. Furthermore, R2’s family member stated they were happy at the facility and had no concerns. Based on the information obtained and reviewed, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to support the allegation of “facility staff failed to bathe resident”. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Continued on LIC 9099C...
|