1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 09/24/25, LPA Gonzalez interviewed R1-R8. Of those interviewed, 8 out of 8 residents denied the allegation. 8 out of 8 residents said staff treat them with dignity and respect.
Based on LPA observation, and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been unsubstantiated.
Allegation: Staff do not ensure that the facility is free of pests. It is being alleged that the facility has roaches. On 09/24/25, LPA Gonzalez interviewed S1-S5, and on 09/25/25, LPA Gonzalez interviewed S6. Of those interviewed, 6 out of 6 staff denied the allegation. S1 stated that they ensure the facility is free of pests by addressing it immediately, and that they have a pest control company come to treat and spray the facility twice a month.
On 09/24/25, LPA Gonzalez interviewed R1-R8. Of those interviewed, 8 out of 8 residents denied the allegation. 8 out of 8 residents said they have not encountered any roaches in the facility. 8 out of 8 residents said that staff has pest control treat the facility regularly. 8 out of 8 residents stated that the facility is kept clean and sanitary.
On 09/25/25, LPA Gonzalez toured the facility and inspected rooms #231, and #203 on the second floor, and rooms #307, and #312 on the third floor. LPA observed the facility and the rooms to be clean, sanitary, and free of roaches. Additionally, LPA Gonzalez reviewed pest control service invoices for the months of August and September 2025 from Excel Pest Management and observed that the company has come to the facility twice per month for general pest control services, to target ants, cockroaches, crickets, earwigs, general pests, silverfish, and spiders.
Based on LPA observations and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been unsubstantiated.
No deficiencies were cited during this investigation. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Azucena Reyes, Administrator. |