1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on interviews R1 requested to be changed frequently and per R1’s Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan dated 2/28/2021 it was revealed the that facility was aware that R1 needs consisted of bowel impairment which required continuous bed care. Plan established by the facility indicated that direct care staff for R1 would ensure that R1 received all the necessary attention and address any physical/health issues observed. Based on video surveillance received dated 4/5/2021 by R1's responsible party (RP) the LPA observed Staff #1 (S1) explaining to R1 that R1 was just changed and did not need to be changed again as they were only a little wet. Interviews also revealed that the resident needs a Hoyer lift and although R1 only requires a one person assist, interview with licensee confirmed that Staff #2 (S2) required a second staff for assistance as R1 was too heavy for S2 to lift or reposition alone. Interview with S2 revealed that rather than asking staff to help S2 with repositioning R1 they would ask R1 to help with repositioning themselves in order to avoid requesting a second staff for assistance. Interviews further revealed that on 4/5/2022 R1 asked to be changed after S1 had left for the day and S2 communicated to R1 that they had too wait until S1 would return to the facility to be changed. Based on interviews and record review the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time.
Regarding the allegation: Staff failed to treat resident with dignity and respect
On 4/13/22, the LPA interviewed owner/licensee at which time the LPA observed the licensee become agitated when discussing the above allegation. Video surveillance confirmed that the licensee had several interactions with R1 that verified the licensee’s actions toward R1. Video surveillance showed the licensee raising their voice at R1, pacing back and forth in their room, throwing their arms up in the air from frustration toward the residents requests, speaking to the resident in a harsh manner and making R1 feel bad for asking for, so many requests. When discussing these allegations, the licensee confirmed these actions. Interview with R1 confirmed that staff are frustrated with helping them and staff interviews confirmed that R1 made consistent requests. The allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time.
Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies are cited (refer to LIC 9099-D). Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report issued.
|