1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from 9099-D
It was reported that “ Staff did not provide proper medication assistance to residents in care”, as it was alleged that R1 was allowed to obtain their own medications from the medication cabinet and administer themselves. Interviews revealed that R1 was allowed access to their medication, which was stored in a medication cabinet located in the kitchen, upon request. On 07/10/2025, between approximately 9:46 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., during a separate complaint investigation (Complaint Control #29-AS-20250709155231), LPA observed R1’s medications being stored in R1’s room. During that same visit, staff relocated the medications to the designated centrally stored medication area. In an interview, Staff #1 (S1) stated that R1 would become agitated if not given access to their medications at the time of administration, so staff permitted R1 to access their medication as needed. On 09/04/2025, during an annual inspection visit, LPA observed medications stored in Resident #2 (R2)’s room. . During that same visit, staff relocated the medications to the designated centrally stored medication area. Based on information gathered during the investigation, the department has sufficient evidence to confirm these allegations occurred. Therefore, the allegation that “Staff did not provide proper medication assistance to residents in care” has been deemed Substantiated at this time.
It was reported that facility is malodorous, as it was alleged that the facility smelled like urine due to staff not keeping the facility well maintained. Interviews conducted with five (5) residents in care revealed that all (5) residents have had concerns with S1 not being proactive in keeping facility clean and free from smells. Furthermore (3) out of (5) residents stated they have observed the smell of urine and they believe it is due to staff not changing R2’s urine bag in a timely manner. Based on information gathered during the investigation, the department has sufficient evidence to confirm these allegations occurred. Therefore, the allegation that “facility is malodorous” has been deemed Substantiated at this time.
Civil penalties in the amount of $1,250 are assessed today for repeat violations. The Licensee was informed that additional civil penalties might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49(e) and 1569.49(f).Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies are cited (refer to LIC 9099-D).
Licensee contacted LPA at approx 11:20 a.m. and stated they were unable to be onsite during the visit, but stated staff will sign in their place. LPA conducted exit interview with Licensee over the phone along with staff onsite, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report issued. |