1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff failed to provide resident with a comfortable environment. During this investigation, LPA interviewed Staff #1 through Staff #5. LPA also interviewed Resident #1 (R-1). Room relocation: (4) out of the (5) staff interviews revealed that R-1 was offered different rooms for relocation as R-1 indicated R-1’s roommate sleeps during the day time, is awake all night and disturbs R-1. R-1 also indicated staff offered R-1 different rooms, however, R-1 did not like the rooms being offered. Laundry services: (5) out of (5) interviewed staff indicated residents’ clothes are washed separately from other residents. Interviewed staff indicated each resident has their own hamper. LPA was provided with a staff lesson plan/training that was conducted with Staff which specifically covers personal laundry procedures and states “laundry will be washed separately”. Interviewed staff indicated R-1’s roommate is not left wearing soiled/dirty diapers all night and that staff conduct rounds every (2) hours. However, staff do not keep a log of the rounds that are being conducted. Interviewed staff indicated they have not observed nor received any complaints in regards to resident being left soiled. LPA toured R-1’s bedroom and did not smell any strong odors. Per, interviews and per observation, this allegation cannot be corroborated.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was conducted, a copy of this report and Appeal Rights were provided to Carlos Lara. |