1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 | Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a subsequent visit to the facility to follow up on the above allegation. The initial visit by LPA Cava was made on 07/19/24. At that time, the investigation was Substantiated. LPAs investigation consisted of staff and resident interviews and record review. It was reported that the facility did not have a required staff, or nurse, on shift, on 06/08/24 and 06/14/24. According to the facility's program design, "an LVN remains on duty until relieved by incoming staff". Report by another agency was received, and it revealed that on 06/08/24, Staff 1 (S1), called off, and Staff 2 (S2) was called to provide coverage. However, S2 left at approximately 9pm, which entails that the facility failed to follow their contigency plan, identified in the Program Design. Although the facility's Program Design indicates that an LVN will remain on duty until releived by incoming staff, R1's Agreement Agreement (AA) only specifies that R1 will receive Continuous Care and Supervision. No specification indicated on R1's AA that R1 requires a nurse for continuous care. Therefore, based on further review, the above allegation will be deemed Unsubstantiated. |