1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Staff are not ensuring the residents are properly fed while in care. It’s being alleged that a dietary requirement has come to an immediate halt after 14 years. The investigation revealed the following: 5 of 6 interviewed could not confirm the allegation to be true. R2-6 all state they either have no issues with receiving enough food or they have access to additional items, such as fruits, vegetables and juices. R2 and R3 state they receive “more than enough and sometimes too much,” respectively. R4 states, “everything is fine and there are no complaints with the food.” R5 states, “oh yes, plenty, I gained weight since I moved here.” R6 states, “sometimes the portions are small, but you can get another which I’ve done a few times.” R6 states they have access to additional portions of food, juices and fruits. “Oh yea, anytime you want.” R1 states, “the facility’s new manager is denying them access to prune juice and that they don’t eat the meals at the facility because they are so darn awful.”
During interviews with the staff. 5 out of 5 denied the allegation and confirmed that residents have access to additional items per their request. S1 states residents are not denied food ever. S2 states there is one resident that would take a shopping bag to the kitchen and request items in bulk. The facility discouraged this because the resident has access to items daily at the bistro or at their request. S3 & S4 states that R1 would come to the facility kitchen and request a “list of items. S4 states, “R1 request a bunch of food items at once, like 15 bananas and they don’t use them, so they go bad in the room and when housekeeping comes to clean, they find all this rotten food.” S5 states she is following the directives of S1 and that R1 used to request a list of items. “Before, we gave like 15 prune juices at once, 15 bottle waters. Now I have a new boss that said we cannot give that many at once anymore. The residents can request each day.”
Based on LPA’s observation, interviews conducted, and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was given. |